GPT-5 or Claude 3.7 SonnetUse this before applying to a role that is close to your background but not an exact match, especially when you need to decide whether to apply now, revise your resume first, or spend a week closing obvious gaps.Technology

این Prompt هوش مصنوعی رزومه را به تحلیل شکاف تطابق شغلی تبدیل می‌کند

اشتراک‌گذاری:
این Prompt هوش مصنوعی رزومه را به تحلیل شکاف تطابق شغلی تبدیل می‌کند

Why this prompt matters

Most applicants lose interviews before anyone speaks to them because their resume does not show fit clearly enough. A structured gap analysis helps you focus on the missing evidence that actually blocks callbacks instead of wasting time on cosmetic edits.

What we use it for

Use this before applying to a role that is close to your background but not an exact match, especially when you need to decide whether to apply now, revise your resume first, or spend a week closing obvious gaps.

Prompt

Role: Act as a senior recruiter, hiring manager, and career coach in one.

Context: I will paste a resume and a target job description. Your job is to compare them like a real hiring team would. I want an honest gap analysis, not generic encouragement.

Task:
1. Summarize the target role in plain English.
2. Extract the 10 most important requirements from the job description, separating must-have skills from nice-to-have skills.
3. Score the resume against each requirement on a 0-5 scale and explain the reasoning.
4. Identify the biggest gaps, including missing technical skills, weak evidence, unclear achievements, or missing keywords.
5. Rewrite the 5 weakest resume bullets so they better match the role without inventing experience.
6. Suggest a prioritized improvement plan for the next 7 days and the next 30 days.
7. Generate 12 likely interview questions based on the gaps, and give a short preparation note for each.
8. Flag any claims that sound vague, inflated, or unsupported.

Constraints:
- Do not invent achievements, employers, dates, metrics, certifications, or tools that are not in the resume.
- Be direct and specific. Avoid generic advice like 'tailor your resume more.'
- If the candidate appears underqualified, say so clearly and explain the fastest path to improve.
- Use the language of the job description where appropriate, but do not keyword-stuff.
- Separate issues of substance from issues of wording.

Output Format:
A. Role Summary
B. Requirement Matrix Table
C. Top Gaps
D. Rewritten Resume Bullets
E. 7-Day Improvement Plan
F. 30-Day Improvement Plan
G. Interview Questions and Prep Notes
H. Final Hiring Readiness Verdict

[PASTE TARGET JOB DESCRIPTION]
[PASTE CURRENT RESUME]
[OPTIONAL: PASTE LINKEDIN SUMMARY]
[OPTIONAL: PASTE PORTFOLIO OR GITHUB NOTES]

Result

A. Role Summary This Product Operations Manager role sits between product, analytics, and go-to-market teams. The company wants someone who can turn messy launch processes into repeatable systems, own KPI reporting, and coordinate cross-functional execution without slowing teams down. The job is less about pure project management and more about building operational discipline around product decisions.

B. Requirement Matrix Table 1. Cross-functional program leadership, Score: 4/5. Your resume shows coordination across product, engineering, and support, but the scale of launches is not quantified. 2. KPI dashboard ownership, Score: 2/5. You mention reporting, but there is no evidence that you defined metrics or maintained executive dashboards. 3. SQL proficiency, Score: 1/5. No direct SQL experience is listed. This is a clear must-have gap. 4. Process design, Score: 4/5. Strong evidence from onboarding workflow redesign and ticket triage improvements. 5. Stakeholder communication, Score: 4/5. Your examples show regular communication with leaders, but not enough evidence of executive-level decision support. 6. Experiment analysis, Score: 2/5. You mention A/B tests, but not the methodology or business impact. 7. Documentation and SOP creation, Score: 5/5. This is one of the strongest parts of the resume. 8. Product launch support, Score: 3/5. Relevant experience exists, but the bullets are generic. 9. Tools fit, Score: 3/5. Jira and Looker are relevant; the absence of SQL and Amplitude weakens the match. 10. Business impact storytelling, Score: 2/5. Several bullets describe activity, not results.

C. Top Gaps The biggest blocker is analytical credibility. A recruiter could plausibly believe you supported product operations, but not that you can independently drive KPI reviews or investigate launch performance. The second issue is evidence quality. Too many bullets use phrases like 'helped with' or 'supported' without showing ownership, scale, or measurable outcomes.

D. Rewritten Resume Bullet Example Original: Supported product launches across multiple teams. Rewritten: Coordinated launch readiness across product, engineering, support, and marketing for 6 feature releases in two quarters, reducing last-minute issue escalation by 28 percent through a standardized pre-launch checklist.

E. 7-Day Improvement Plan Add one analytics project to your resume, even if it comes from internal reporting work. Rewrite the summary around product operations outcomes, not responsibilities. Complete one SQL refresher project and add it to your skills section only if you can discuss it confidently.

F. 30-Day Improvement Plan Build a small portfolio artifact, such as a launch dashboard mockup or KPI review template. Collect two stronger metrics from past work. Replace weak verbs across the resume and LinkedIn with ownership language backed by evidence.

G. Final Hiring Readiness Verdict You are plausible for this role if the company is flexible on SQL and values operations maturity, but as written the resume will likely miss the interview cut at more competitive firms. Focus on evidence, analytics credibility, and sharper launch-impact bullets before applying broadly.

این Prompt برای یکی از رایج‌ترین مشکلات جستجوی شغل ساخته شده است: تشخیص اینکه آیا رزومه شما واقعاً با نقش مورد نظرتان مطابقت دارد یا خیر. به جای اینکه از یک ابزار هوش مصنوعی بخواهید «رزومه من را بهبود بده»، این نسخه یک مقایسه ساختاریافته بین رزومه فعلی و شرح شغل هدف ایجاد می‌کند.

چه چیزی این Prompt را مفید می‌کند

ساختار مهم است. این Prompt الزامات ضروری را از الزامات خوب‌داشت جدا می‌کند، به هر الزام نمره می‌دهد و سپس نکات ضعیف را بدون اختراع تجربه بازنویسی می‌کند. این کار نتیجه را در واقعیت نگه می‌دارد؛ جایی که بیشتر Promptهای رزومه شکست می‌خورند.

همچنین فراتر از ویرایش عمل می‌کند. خروجی شامل یک برنامه ۷ روزه، یک برنامه ۳۰ روزه و سوالات احتمالی مصاحبه است. این ویژگی حتی وقتی پاسخ ناخوشایند است مفید است، مثلاً وقتی متوجه می‌شوید مشکل واقعی کمبود شواهد است نه بیان بد.

چگونه از آن به خوبی استفاده کنید

شرح شغل دقیق را Paste کنید، سپس رزومه فعلی خود را بدون تلاش برای پالایش قبلی Paste کنید. اگر خلاصه لینکدین یا یادداشت‌های پروژه دارید، آن‌ها را هم اضافه کنید. هرچه ورودی خام بهتر باشد، تحلیل شکاف بهتری خواهید داشت.

این روش به ویژه برای افرادی که به نقش‌های مجاور تغییر می‌کنند مفید است، مثلاً از پشتیبانی عملیات به عملیات محصول، یا از بازاریابی عمومی به نقش‌های چرخه عمر یا رشد. این Prompt به شما کمک می‌کند تصمیم بگیرید که آیا همیشه اقدام کنید، ابتدا بازبینی کنید، یا زمان صرف پر کردن یک یا دو شکاف معنادار کنید.

prompt-engineeringai-promptCareerresumejob-searchinterview-prep
اشتراک‌گذاری: