منشئ مصفوفة القرارات لأي خيار مصيري

Prompt

Act as a senior strategy consultant who specializes in structured decision-making frameworks.

I need to make a major decision and want to use a weighted scoring matrix to evaluate my options objectively.

My decision: [DESCRIBE YOUR DECISION IN 1-2 SENTENCES]

My options:
1. [OPTION A]
2. [OPTION B]
3. [OPTION C]
(Add more if needed)

My criteria for evaluating these options (list what matters most):
- [CRITERION 1, e.g. cost]
- [CRITERION 2, e.g. implementation time]
- [CRITERION 3, e.g. team capability]
- [CRITERION 4, e.g. long-term scalability]
(Add or remove criteria as needed)

Constraints and context:
- [ANY HARD CONSTRAINTS — e.g. budget cap, deadline, must-have features]
- [RELEVANT CONTEXT — e.g. team size, current situation, strategic goals]

Do the following:
1. Review my criteria and suggest adjustments if any important factor is missing or if two criteria overlap significantly.
2. Ask me to assign weights to each criterion (1-5, where 5 = most important) — or assign sensible weights yourself based on the context I provided and explain your reasoning.
3. Score each option against every criterion on a scale of 1-10.
4. Calculate the weighted score for each option (score × weight, summed).
5. Present a clean scoring table with: criteria | weight | scores per option | weighted scores | totals.
6. Identify the winning option and explain in 2-3 sentences why it scored highest.
7. Flag any minority concern: if the runner-up is close or if the top scorer has a critical weakness, call it out explicitly.

Output format:
- Start with the scoring table (use markdown table formatting)
- Follow with a 3-paragraph analysis: winner rationale, key tradeoffs, one risk to watch

Result